<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: C3?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chuckpeters.iowa.com/2009/10/c3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chuckpeters.iowa.com/2009/10/c3/</link>
	<description>Chuck Peters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:21:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: C3 Employee Live Blogs &#124; C3 - Complete Community Connection</title>
		<link>http://chuckpeters.iowa.com/2009/10/c3/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>C3 Employee Live Blogs &#124; C3 - Complete Community Connection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckpeters.iowa.com/?p=190#comment-301</guid>
		<description>[...] and the implications of the changing community information environment outlined in my recent post C3 with interested employees over the next two days. In the spirit of transparency and maximum [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and the implications of the changing community information environment outlined in my recent post C3 with interested employees over the next two days. In the spirit of transparency and maximum [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The fall and rise of the media industry &#171; Geir Stene&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://chuckpeters.iowa.com/2009/10/c3/comment-page-1/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>The fall and rise of the media industry &#171; Geir Stene&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckpeters.iowa.com/?p=190#comment-300</guid>
		<description>[...] And be ready for further change, this is not over, it’s barely began. Take a look at the  at 3C for further understanding of a new media house set up, I&#8217;ve been blogging and discussing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And be ready for further change, this is not over, it’s barely began. Take a look at the  at 3C for further understanding of a new media house set up, I&#8217;ve been blogging and discussing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abe Abreu, Sr.</title>
		<link>http://chuckpeters.iowa.com/2009/10/c3/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Abe Abreu, Sr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckpeters.iowa.com/?p=190#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Looks much better Chuck, thanks. Everybody needs an editor, I guess :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks much better Chuck, thanks. Everybody needs an editor, I guess <img src='http://chuckpeters.iowa.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuck.peters</title>
		<link>http://chuckpeters.iowa.com/2009/10/c3/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck.peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckpeters.iowa.com/?p=190#comment-295</guid>
		<description>Thanks Abe.  I should have noted that your comments were from a public exchange between us, but were not edited for publication.  I have made the edits, as I now note.  Look better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Abe.  I should have noted that your comments were from a public exchange between us, but were not edited for publication.  I have made the edits, as I now note.  Look better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abe Abreu Sr.</title>
		<link>http://chuckpeters.iowa.com/2009/10/c3/comment-page-1/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Abe Abreu Sr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckpeters.iowa.com/?p=190#comment-291</guid>
		<description>Hey Chuck, decent post, nice board recap, and thanks for the attribution. Seems my typos made into your post as well. I also noticed my ICMF thing made it to the board meeting - again. 

What&#039;s amazing to me is, that the ICMF concept persistently permeates my new concepts, one way or another. From the point of view of the life cycle of content - from acquisition to connection to sharing and packaging - this life cycle idea has, at least in my mind, stood the test of time: the WHAT (a life cycle for maximizing content value/chain) hasn&#039;t changed much; the WHY (connecting communities, sharing, multiple channels, monetizing the atoms etc.) has morphed a bit as an articulation, but not as a business objective. But the HOW - now that&#039;s where much of the action seems to be.  

In the last year alone, the &quot;smart content&quot; space (e.g. using semantic technologies to mine relevance and maximize connection/value)is where all the slideware is emerging. We&#039;re even starting to see some value emerge as well. And while we are seeing progress in he &quot;user engagement and experience layer&quot; (e.g. iPhone interface, minimalist/visually rich designs, embedded navigable video, etc.)we still are a long way from (and I&#039;m really starting to tire of this phrase) &quot;monetizing the engagement&quot;. It seems that what we are lacking - still - is business innovation. 

So what? We have new technologies! How do we make life better for our users and how can we make a living doing it?

Despite all the advances, It seems the end results is still web sites that splash stories, link videos, place search and puke ads. The &quot;new monetizable value&quot; is still not apparent, and consequently, media maintains a posture of skepticism. Media is as media does, I guess!

After several years of consulting for you at the Gazette on these big changes, I feel like rubber is just starting to hit the road - on the systems/design and implementation side, mostly. Once we get this prototype off the ground at the Gazette, e-Me will be focused on packaging the experience, technical content, processes and methodologies and related knowledge assets into an engagement service to both help other similarly risk-willing media companies walk this path. 

To be fair, e-Me needs to advance its own work, We need to figure out creative ways (in this investment-narrow market) to get to the capital and people needed to complete the work we started, and to develop new applications to sit on top of this growing heap of semantic piece-parts. In the meantime, our community experiment over at The Daily Blank is gaining traction, writers and a following.

I believe that this experiment between Gazette Company and e-Me will have mutual benefit and help us both survive the times.

Thanks again for the opportunity!!

Abe
abe.abreu@e-meventures.com 

I look forward to working with my core team of Audrey, Becky, &amp; Mike to get to a baseline. From there, lots of work internally to &quot;seat&quot; people in front of the new semantic content tool kit.

Progress!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chuck, decent post, nice board recap, and thanks for the attribution. Seems my typos made into your post as well. I also noticed my ICMF thing made it to the board meeting &#8211; again. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s amazing to me is, that the ICMF concept persistently permeates my new concepts, one way or another. From the point of view of the life cycle of content &#8211; from acquisition to connection to sharing and packaging &#8211; this life cycle idea has, at least in my mind, stood the test of time: the WHAT (a life cycle for maximizing content value/chain) hasn&#8217;t changed much; the WHY (connecting communities, sharing, multiple channels, monetizing the atoms etc.) has morphed a bit as an articulation, but not as a business objective. But the HOW &#8211; now that&#8217;s where much of the action seems to be.  </p>
<p>In the last year alone, the &#8220;smart content&#8221; space (e.g. using semantic technologies to mine relevance and maximize connection/value)is where all the slideware is emerging. We&#8217;re even starting to see some value emerge as well. And while we are seeing progress in he &#8220;user engagement and experience layer&#8221; (e.g. iPhone interface, minimalist/visually rich designs, embedded navigable video, etc.)we still are a long way from (and I&#8217;m really starting to tire of this phrase) &#8220;monetizing the engagement&#8221;. It seems that what we are lacking &#8211; still &#8211; is business innovation. </p>
<p>So what? We have new technologies! How do we make life better for our users and how can we make a living doing it?</p>
<p>Despite all the advances, It seems the end results is still web sites that splash stories, link videos, place search and puke ads. The &#8220;new monetizable value&#8221; is still not apparent, and consequently, media maintains a posture of skepticism. Media is as media does, I guess!</p>
<p>After several years of consulting for you at the Gazette on these big changes, I feel like rubber is just starting to hit the road &#8211; on the systems/design and implementation side, mostly. Once we get this prototype off the ground at the Gazette, e-Me will be focused on packaging the experience, technical content, processes and methodologies and related knowledge assets into an engagement service to both help other similarly risk-willing media companies walk this path. </p>
<p>To be fair, e-Me needs to advance its own work, We need to figure out creative ways (in this investment-narrow market) to get to the capital and people needed to complete the work we started, and to develop new applications to sit on top of this growing heap of semantic piece-parts. In the meantime, our community experiment over at The Daily Blank is gaining traction, writers and a following.</p>
<p>I believe that this experiment between Gazette Company and e-Me will have mutual benefit and help us both survive the times.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the opportunity!!</p>
<p>Abe<br />
<a href="mailto:abe.abreu@e-meventures.com">abe.abreu@e-meventures.com</a> </p>
<p>I look forward to working with my core team of Audrey, Becky, &amp; Mike to get to a baseline. From there, lots of work internally to &#8220;seat&#8221; people in front of the new semantic content tool kit.</p>
<p>Progress!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention C3? &#124; C3 - Complete Community Connection -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://chuckpeters.iowa.com/2009/10/c3/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention C3? &#124; C3 - Complete Community Connection -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckpeters.iowa.com/?p=190#comment-290</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Steve Buttry and geir stene, geir stene. geir stene said: Read an learn!Show this one to every manager in the media business you know of! My friend @cpetersia knows what to do: http://bit.ly/1rCWhV [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Steve Buttry and geir stene, geir stene. geir stene said: Read an learn!Show this one to every manager in the media business you know of! My friend @cpetersia knows what to do: <a href="http://bit.ly/1rCWhV" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1rCWhV</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

